Ringlet (Aphantopus hyperantus)
2024 photographs highlighted in yellow. Click on any photograph to go to an enlarged picture, or simply scroll down the page.
Slightly confusingly named in that it is not part of the genus Erebia which are also known as Ringlets. There are two true Erebia Ringlets that occur in the UK, but only in the north of England and in Scotland, the Scotch Argus (E. aethiops) and the Mountain Ringlet (E. epiphron), but some forty or so Erebia cousins in Europe where they are generally restricted to the mountainous areas of the Alpes, Pyrénées and the Massif Central. Hyperantus is the only European representative of the genus Aphantopus.
Hyperantus is an attractive chocolate-brown with yellow-ringed underside ocelli and is considerably more attractive than many of its scarcer cousins. I rarely see it in France as it does not seem to occur in southern Var (Lafranchis France shows it occurring in Var, but this may be in the north). |
The sexes are rather similar, although from an upperside view, the female tends to have larger ocelli. From an underside view, the ground colour of the female tends to be a lighter brown; this is subjective of course, but the contrast can be seen from the pair in copula in 41054 below. Also, the female forewing margin is said to be a little rounder (but see the comments below).
There is also a species known as the False Ringlet (Coenonympha oedippus), which is very rare and is actually a member of the Coenonympha Heath genus but has a series of unh yellow-ringed ocelli and does look rather like hyperantus; until 2015, I had only seen oedippus on one occasion in 1998 when I took a rather poor photograph and it was only several years later that I realised it was not hyperantus but oedippus - a great opportunity missed. |
ref | sex |
observations |
alt. m |
51187 | M | a reasonably fresh male warming up after a period of cloud cover. | 1160 |
52329 | M | a male, an uncommon opportunity with open wings in overcst conditions. | 1080 |
52775 | M | a male, included here even though a poor photograph, as it has almost non-existent upf ocelli. | 1400 |
27455 | F | the smaller ocelli may indicate a male, but the body shape says female. | 1330 |
04_355-18 | F |
a female, as indicated by the larger ocelli and the shorter and fatter body shape. |
90 |
48554 | F | a rather poor photograph of a rather worn individual, but it does give another example of the enlarged ocelli of the female upperside, for a species that normally rests with closed wings. | 1340 |
52331 | M | a male, I believe, based on the slightly darker ground colour. However, if the roundness of the forewing margin is a clue to the sex, 52331 would be labelled as a female and 11691 as a male. Either the forewing roundness or the ground colour clue is not right. 27455 is clearly female, so it appears that the forewing roundness is the less reliable clue. | 1080 |
11691 | F |
I think this is a female based on the lighter ground colour, the paler submarginal band, the more pronounced ocelli, and the rounded hindwing shape, although I would have expected slightly more scalloping. |
1080 |
33198 | F | I believe this to be a female for much the same reasons as 11691. | 1100 |
41054 | PAIR | a pair in copula. I would assume that the female is on the left, based on the lighter colouring. They were sitting on a road, albeit a little used road, in the Hautes-Alpes, so after taking the photograph, they were shepherded to a safer spot. | 1490 |
51187_male_Pyrénées-Orientales_5Jul23
52329_male_Alpes-Maritimes_30Jun24
27455_female_Hautes-Alpes_16Jul11
04_355-18_female_Herts, UK_11Jul04
52331_male_Alpes-Maritimes_30Jun24
11691_female_Alpes-Maritimes_28Jun08
33198_female_Alpes-de-Haute-Provence_1Jul13
41054_pair_Hautes-Alpes_8Jul16